Ethereum Classic—not to be confused with Ethereum, the world’s second-largest crypto—rallied up by 50% in just three days last week, from 18–20 March. As the Classic version rallied, Ethereum was seen trading 2.3% lower during the same time.
At present, Ethereum Classic is ranked 28 by market cap, while Ethereum (ETH) is in the top 2 and has a higher valuation too, according to CoinMarketCap. Read on to find out all about them and the latest development in their twin destinies, and don’t forget to track their current prices on CoinSwitch .
All about Ethereum Classic
ET Spotlight Special
Ethereum Classic (ETC) is a decentralized, blockchain-based open-source computing platform. It allows developers to create and deploy smart contracts, and host and support decentralized applications (dApps). Ethereum Classic’s native token is ETC.
However, some members of the community were against it because they believed that blockchains cannot be manipulated by human whims; so they stuck with the old chain, renaming it Ethereum Classic (ETC).
Why did ETC move over the past month? Since the beginning of 2021, the ETC price has risen significantly due to an increase in cryptocurrency prices and renewed development activity on the Ethereum Classic blockchain. Despite the volatility of the crypto market, such a rally is not all that uncommon. So let us look at factors that might have triggered the sharp upmove:
The PoS factor. Ethereum is getting ready to transition to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) protocol in the second quarter of 2022. The move that reduces Ethereum’s environmental costs is proving to be a blessing for its Classic sibling, as Ethereum miners are switching to Ethereum Classic ahead of it. A possible reason for this could be due to the fact that some value Proof-of-Work more. While the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism is considered greener, many believe the PoW protocol provides the most decentralization and security.
Ethereum Classic’s rigid ideology. The Classic community strongly believes in the principle that “code is law”; its ideological differences with Ethereum were partially the cause of the hard fork. Sticking to the original code, Ethereum Classic has pledged to remain a PoW crypto. While remaining a PoW, ETC relaunched the Mantis Client and emergency upgrades by the Core-Geth protocol provider, which may have increased user confidence in the blockchain’s stability.
Ethereum’s high gas fees have been a major concern in recent times. Critics frequently cite the network’s high fees as a fatal flaw, but with Ethereum 2.0, there is a promise of lower gas fees. The Ethereum 2.0 upgrade aims to make the crypto more scalable, secure, and sustainable, with the aim of earning the goodwill of eco-friendly folks. But we don’t know yet if that will work out; whether the recent ETC upmove is a temporary thing, or if ETH will indeed successfully gain more users, only time can tell.
Wrap-up: Implications for crypto buyers As far as the crypto market is concerned, the Ethereum 2.0 upgrade will make high-powered computers competing to solve puzzles as a way of mining new ETH a thing of the past. Also, this upgrade will make ETH greener. And a legion of users is betting the smart contract blockchain will maintain its position at the top. There is also a chance that Ethereum 2.0 will silence its competition, including Solana and Avalanche.
With the impending race to dominate the smart contract race and the competition between ETC and ETH, it may not be a bad idea to have both cryptos in one’s portfolios. Both coins are available at CoinSwitch
, at the best rates.
Disclaimer : The above content is non-editorial, and TIL hereby disclaims any and all warranties, expressed or implied, relating to the same. TIL does not guarantee, vouch for or necessarily endorse any of the above content, nor is it responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. The article does not constitute investment advice. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated and verified.
Crypto products and NFTs are unregulated and can be highly risky. There may be no regulatory recourse for any loss from such transactions.